1963 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 637 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | Munga | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3685 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1747 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 83 L |
