1963 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Ford Ka
To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 91 kg more than 2004 Ford Ka.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2004 Ford Ka | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Ka |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1019 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
