1963 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 552 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 59 L |
