1963 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 846 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 87 L |