1963 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | S60 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |