1963 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1273 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 132 L |
