1963 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 684 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | Munga | XJ |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 85 L |