1963 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,596 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (168 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 730 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2005 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Munga | E |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 68.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |