1963 DKW Munga vs. 2005 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rodius (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 1107 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2005 SsangYong Rodius | |
| Make | DKW | SsangYong |
| Model | Munga | Rodius |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2217 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |
