1963 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | Munga | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |