1963 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 203 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | DKW | Acura |
| Model | Munga | CSX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
