1963 DKW Munga vs. 2006 BMW 630
To start off, 2006 BMW 630 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 630 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 630 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 630 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 630 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 630. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2006 BMW 630 | |
Make | DKW | BMW |
Model | Munga | 630 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |