1963 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 45 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | Munga | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |