1963 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 45 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | DKW | Suzuki |
Model | Munga | Reno |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |