1963 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 144 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford F-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | F-250 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 5399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 12.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 115 L |