1963 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 223 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Ka |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 887 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |