1963 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 61 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Mustang |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1171 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |