1963 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 218 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | DKW | Holden |
| Model | Munga | UTE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
