1963 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2009 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,630 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (252 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2009 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | DKW | Subaru |
Model | Munga | Tribeca |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3630 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |