1963 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,456 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 220 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | Highlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 73 L |