1963 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2010 Ford Bantam is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Bantam (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 126 kg more than 2010 Ford Bantam.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Bantam. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2010 Ford Bantam | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Bantam |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |
