1963 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 270 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | DKW | Smart |
| Model | Munga | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 33 L |
