1963 DKW Munga vs. 2010 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Rexton (183 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 905 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2010 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | DKW | SsangYong |
| Model | Munga | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 78 L |
