1963 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,200 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 22 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | Munga | Polo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1132 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1682 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2470 mm |
