1963 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1963 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daewoo Matiz (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 259 kg more than 2011 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Daewoo Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2011 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | DKW | Daewoo |
| Model | Munga | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 851 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 35 L |
