1963 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2011 Ford Explorer is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Explorer (290 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Explorer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2011 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5006 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1788 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
