1963 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 977 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2087 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1938 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 93 L |