1963 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 826 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 85 L |