1963 DKW Munga vs. 2012 BMW 528
To start off, 2012 BMW 528 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 528 (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 528 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 BMW 528. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2012 BMW 528 | |
| Make | DKW | BMW |
| Model | Munga | 528 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4899 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1464 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2968 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
