1963 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2012 Hyundai i20 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Hyundai i20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Hyundai i20 (99 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai i20 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Hyundai i20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2012 Hyundai i20 | |
| Make | DKW | Hyundai |
| Model | Munga | i20 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17:01 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2525 mm |
