1963 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | DKW | Land Rover |
Model | Munga | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2891 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 104 L |