1963 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1603 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | DKW | Cadillac |
| Model | Munga | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.4 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2713 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5662 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1918 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 117 L |
