1963 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 529 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Munga | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 572 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |
