1963 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 383 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | DKW | Nissan |
Model | Munga | Z |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11:01:00 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |