1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 1955 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1963 Ferrari 156 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1955 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 1955 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Triumph TR2 weights approximately 403 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 156 | 1955 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
Model | 156 | TR2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 56 L |