1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 1968 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1968 Ford GT 40 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 4,948 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford GT 40 (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 498 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 1968 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 156 | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 4948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 424 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2420 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 125 L |
