1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 1968 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1968 Triumph Herald is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 1,486 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1968 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph Herald weights approximately 318 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 1968 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
| Model | 156 | Herald |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 29 L |
