1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Seat Ritmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 1,486 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 418 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Ferrari | Seat |
| Model | 156 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2460 mm |
