1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 1986 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1986 Seat Ronda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 1,486 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1986 Seat Ronda. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 1986 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Seat Ronda weights approximately 438 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 1986 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Ferrari | Seat |
| Model | 156 | Ronda |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2460 mm |
