1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1437 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ferrari 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 156 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ferrari | Jeep |
Model | 156 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 78 L |