1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 628 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ferrari | Renault |
| Model | 156 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 50 L |
