1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo V50 (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 972 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo V50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ferrari 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Ferrari | Volvo |
| Model | 156 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1434 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 58 L |
