1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 348 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 156 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ferrari | Mazda |
Model | 156 | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 55 L |