1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 1023 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 156 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ferrari | Mazda |
Model | 156 | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 55 L |