1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1141 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 156 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 315 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1603 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 61 L |
