1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 156 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1627 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 61 L |
