1963 Ferrari 156 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 838 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ferrari 156 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ferrari | Mazda |
| Model | 156 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 55 L |
