1963 Ferrari 250 GT vs. 1968 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1968 Triumph Herald is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 250 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 250 GT would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 250 GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT (251 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1968 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ferrari 250 GT weights approximately 715 kg more than 1968 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 250 GT | 1968 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
Model | 250 GT | Herald |
Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 29 L |