1963 Ferrari 250 GT vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 250 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 250 GT would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 250 GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT (251 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ferrari 250 GT weights approximately 308 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Ferrari 250 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 250 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier has automatic transmission and 1963 Ferrari 250 GT has manual transmission. 1963 Ferrari 250 GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Ferrari 250 GT 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
Make Ferrari Chevrolet
Model 250 GT Cavalier
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2953 cc 2190 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 251 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 7500 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 73 mm 89.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 58.8 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 1187 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 140 L 57 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]