1963 Ferrari 250 GT vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 250 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 250 GT would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT (251 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-250. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ferrari 250 GT weights approximately 275 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 250 GT | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Ferrari | Ford |
Model | 250 GT | E-250 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 132 L |